KETCHUM, Idaho, June 23 /PRNewswire/ -- An Idaho judge put an abrupt
end to a $2.5 million arbitration demand filed by actor Tom Hanks and his
wife Rita Wilson against a contractor who allegedly did a poor job in
building Hanks' $10 million dollar Sun Valley home.
Judge Robert Elgee ruled that arbitration between these same parties in
2003 completely exonerated the contractor and settled the issue.
Tom Hanks and wife Rita Wilson argued that Storey Construction left
defects in their home from construction completed in 2002. These claims
continued after three arbitrators in 2003 dismissed their claim with
prejudice and awarded them nothing.
Armed with new attorneys, Hanks and Wilson attempted to resuscitate
their failed construction defect case, claiming the defects were latent.
Filing a new demand for arbitration in November 2007, Hanks and Wilson
claimed $2.5 million "in damages caused by alleged construction/design
errors."
"What Tom and Rita don't realize is the law is not like movie making --
you can't reshoot until you get the outcome you like," said attorney Miles
Stanislaw. "The repeated legal actions are baseless and that is exactly
what the court ruled today."
Today's ruling stems from Idaho state law which bans the relitigation
of claims arising from the same transaction or circumstance. Storey
Construction completed work on the home in 2002 and the construction defect
claims were ruled upon by an arbitration panel in 2003, in favor of Storey.
"I am happy that this nightmare is finally over," said Gary Storey,
owner of Storey Construction. "This ongoing harassment from Hanks and
Wilson has put tremendous stress on me, my family and my business."
The legal battle between Storey and the Hanks' began in 2003 when the
construction company placed a lien on the property to receive payment for
the remainder of the balance due. When the couple refused to pay, Storey
took Hanks and Wilson to mandatory arbitration, where the couple
counter-claimed the work was defective and demanded $800,000 in damages.
That arbitration awarded Storey almost $3 million for the balance on
the construction work and Hanks and Wilson nothing.
According to Storey Construction and its attorneys, Storey has already
successfully defended against the defendants' false accusations of
construction defects -- accusations made to avoid paying Storey money that
was due. They claim the defendants are seeking to relitigate a case they
previously lost, and in doing so, are inflicting severe harassment on
Storey.
Judge Elgee based his ruling on well-established Idaho law which
prohibits the relitigation of the same claim.
Hanks and Wilson are now faced with defending themselves against
charges of abuse of process, filed by Storey.
Storey's complaint alleges their latest claim was filed out of desire
for revenge. According to Stanislaw, damages are potentially in the
millions since Idaho law allows for the award of punitive damages against
those who use the legal system for spiteful or improper purposes.
Hanks and Wilson also filed a million-dollar claim against the
architect who designed the home, alleging the same flaws and defects blamed
on Storey.
Mark Firmani (206) 443-9357
Firmani + Associates
mark@firmani.com
See Also:
- Parkway Properties Honored Nationally as One of the 50 Best Places to Work
- The Trump Organization and Nakheel to Sell Most Expensive Penthouse in Dubai
- Diamond Blade-Home and Garden Tool
- Governor Richardson Visits Schuco at Intersolar in Munich
- BLUERIDGE Analytics Receives Patent for SITEOPS(R) Land Development Software
[Via Real Estate Newswire]
Useful Links
0 коментарі:
Post a Comment